Dear Alok Sharma and BoJo

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/25/government-scientist-has-advocated-covid-controls-member-communist/

I didn't vote for an expletive Communist. What the expletive bleeping censored is the government doing letting an organisation headed by a commie make decisions about removing my freedoms?!?

Unbelievable and sickening.


Yours sincerely,
Ashley Black

Cancel culture makes it worse.

Been thinking about woke cancel culture and the resulting self censorship.

Back in the good old days, I could put an opinion on the internet and have it agreed with, or disagreed with, and the flaws in it pointed out. Not always pleasant, and sometimes would result in me feeling bad, but I could think about it, see if the points raised had merit, and modify my views or opinion.

But now, since the threats of being doxed, or canceled, I self censor; I don't put many opinions on the internet. The result is that if any of my opinions are wrong, they are not being challenged, and I can continue to silently seethe about my perceived injustices, but I am sure as hell not going to tell them and engage in any kind of actual discussion as it could result in a ban, doxing, or even loss of livelihoods.

So well done wokests, peoples bad or incorrect views are going unchallenged. You have shut down discussion in your fervour to rid the world of people you disagree with, but they are still there, and their views are now even harder to challenge and change. 

Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill.

 I wrote to my MP about the spycops bill, and in his reply, he said:

"It is unlawful for any public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the legislation makes clear that nothing in the Bill detracts from a public authority’s obligations under the Human Rights Act. Therefore, an act that would be incompatible with the ECHR could not lawfully be granted under this Bill."

What a load of shit, because later in his reply he said, 

"I am aware of the suggestion that listing specific crimes permitted or prohibited would be a way of offering extra safeguards. I do not believe this would be appropriate. This approach would place in the hands of criminals, terrorists and hostile states a means of identifying agents and sources, creating a potential checklist for suspected CHIS to be tested against. This would place CHIS at personal risk."

Well, the test is easy now innit, Crims, and terrorists just make the "operatives" violate the ECHR, and there we go. 

Here is my reply to him:

Dear Alok

Regarding the: Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill

Let me start by saying I don't care about what the security services do to keep us safe from national and international threats. 

What I care about is the police and all the random other authorities that can now break the law.

From the bill:

----

A1 Any police force. B1 The National Crime Agency. C1 The Serious Fraud Office. The intelligence services D1 Any of the intelligence services. The armed forces E1 Any of Her Majesty’s forces. Revenue and Customs F1 Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. Government departments G1 The Department of Health and Social Care. H1 The Home Office. I1 The Ministry of Justice. Other bodies J1 The Competition and Markets Authority. K1 The Environment Agency. L1 The Financial Conduct Authority. M1 The Food Standards Agency. N1 The Gambling Commission.”

---

The police currently don't abide by the EU human rights anyway, and you are giving them all this extra power? 

For example

Right to free speech?  Nope, police don't abide by that, and parliament doesn't care. Cause god help us if someone's feelings are hurt. Or you make a sound that could be deemed offensive. 

Right to silence? Nope, Tony did away with that, and you lot did nothing to restore it. 

Right to a private life? Nope, You had a tail put on everyone online activity, except your own. How telling. 

Right to free movement? Nope, and this was before all these covid laws, the police could pull you over and demand your papers, just like the gestapo. 

So you said:

"It is unlawful for any public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the legislation makes clear that nothing in the Bill detracts from a public authority’s obligations under the Human Rights Act. Therefore, an act that would be incompatible with the ECHR could not lawfully be granted under this Bill."

But you also said:

"I am aware of the suggestion that listing specific crimes permitted or prohibited would be a way of offering extra safeguards. I do not believe this would be appropriate. This approach would place in the hands of criminals, terrorists and hostile states a means of identifying agents and sources, creating a potential checklist for suspected CHIS to be tested against. This would place CHIS at personal risk."

Well, the test is easy now innit, Crims, and terrorists can just make the "operatives" violate the ECHR, and there we go. 

So my dear unrepresentative MP, I take what you said about respecting our rights, and I don't believe a word. 

And let Boris know that I am deeply disappointed in the dictatorship his government is turning into. Because I voted Boris, not Alok. 

May the next election be a bloodbath. (figuratively speaking of course, and I hate that I have to qualify that just incase your bullies in blue take it the wrong way)

Yours in disgust, as usual,

Ashley Black

A letter to all MP's

Dear Alok Sharma, and all MP's

https://www.theregister.com/2020/06/11/ukgov_post_office_fujitsu_horizon_review/

As usual, a big company absolutely screws its postmasters, and there will be no justice, and no proper compensation for lost livelihoods and even the lives that were lost.  

Sick of it. 

So many issues to sort out:

Launch a proper inquiry into the Fujitsu Horizon post office scandal.

Abolish the blairite traitorous supreme court.

Stop the police investigating themselves. Form a Public prosecutions authority who will can prosecute the police, the CPS, and even politicians for law breaking. Or are they going to remain above the law?

Abolish the BBC Tax. 

Prosecute all those involved in turning a blind eye to the child grooming scandal.  Or because they are police and politicians they are above the law? 

So much wrong, and you all do NOTHING to make it right. 

Yours sincerely,

ARB

The UK, is it worth it?

REST OF THE WORLD VERSION:

 The squirrel works hard in the withering heat all summer long,
 building and  improving his house and laying up supplies for the
 winter.  The grasshopper  thinks he's a fool, and laughs and
dances and plays the summer away.  Come  winter, the squirrel is
 warm and well fed.  The shivering grasshopper has no  food or
 shelter, so he dies out in the cold.

                        THE END

                        THE U.K. VERSION:
The squirrel works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building
 his house and laying up supplies for the winter.  The grasshopper
 thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
 Come winter, the squirrel is warm and well fed.

A social worker finds the shivering grasshopper, calls a press conference
 and demands to know why the squirrel should be allowed to be warm and well
fed while others less fortunate, like the grasshopper, are cold and starving.
 The BBC shows up to provide live coverage of the shivering grasshopper;
 with cuts to a video of the squirrel in his comfortable warm home with a
table laden with food.


The British press inform people that they should be ashamed that in a country
 of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so, while others
 have plenty.  The Labour Party, Greenpeace, Animal Rights and The Grasshopper
 Council of GB demonstrate in front of the squirrel's house.
  The BBC, interrupting a cultural festival special from Notting Hill with
breaking news, broadcasts a multi cultural choir singing "We Shall Overcome".


Ken Livingstone rants in an interview with Trevor McDonald that the squirrel  got rich
off the backs of grasshoppers, and calls for an immediate tax hike on the squirrel
 to make him pay his "fair share" and increases the charge for squirrels to enter
 inner London.

In response to pressure from the media, the Government drafts the Economic
Equity and Grasshopper Anti Discrimination Act, retroactive to the beginning of
 the summer.  The squirrel's taxes are reassessed.  He is taken to court and
 fined for failing to hire grasshoppers as builders for the work he was doing on
 his home and an additional fine for contempt when he told the court the grasshopper
 did not want to work.  The grasshopper is provided with a council house, financial
 aid to furnish it and an account with a local taxi  firm to ensure he can be
socially mobile.  The squirrel's food is seized and redistributed to the more
needy members of society, in this case the grasshopper.  Without enough money
 to buy more food, to pay the fine and his newly imposed retroactive taxes, the
 squirrel has to downsize and start building a new home.

The local authority takes over his old home and utilize it as a temporary home
 for asylum seeking cats who had hijacked a plane to get to Britain as they had
to share their country of origin with mice. On arrival they tried to blow up the
 airport because of Britain's apparent love of dogs.  The cats had been arrested
 for the international offense of hijacking and attempted bombing but were
immediately released because the police fed them pilchards instead of salmon
whilst in custody.  Initial moves to then return them to their own country were
 abandoned because it was feared they would face death by the mice. The cats
devise and start a scam to obtain money from people's credit cards.

A Panorama special shows the grasshopper finishing up the last of the squirrel's
 food, though spring is still months away, while the council house he is in, crumbles
 around him because he hasn't bothered to maintain

the house.  He is shown to be taking drugs. Inadequate government funding is
blamed for the grasshopper's drug 'illness'.  The cats seek recompense in the
 British courts for their treatment since arrival in UK.

The grasshopper gets arrested for stabbing an old dog during a burglary to get
money for his drugs habit. He is imprisoned but released immediately because
 he has been in custody for a few weeks.  He is placed in the care of the
probation service to monitor and supervise him. Within a few weeks he has
 killed a guinea pig in a botched robbery.

A commission of inquiry, that will eventually cost £10,000,000 and state the
 obvious, is set up.  Additional money is put into funding a drug rehabilitation
 scheme for grasshoppers and legal aid for lawyers representing asylum seekers
is increased.  The asylum-seeking cats are praised by the government for enriching
 Britain's multicultural diversity and dogs are criticized by the government for failing
 to befriend the cats.

The grasshopper dies of a drug overdose. The usual sections of the press blame
 it on the obvious failure of government to address the root causes of despair
arising from social inequity and his traumatic experience of
prison.   They call for the resignation of a minister.  The cats are paid a
million pounds each because their rights were infringed when the government
failed to inform them there were mice in the United Kingdom.
The squirrel, the dogs and the victims of the hijacking, the bombing,
the burglaries and robberies have to pay an additional percentage on
 their credit cards to cover losses, their taxes are increased to pay for law and
order and they are told that they will have to work beyond 65 because of a
shortfall in government funds.

                        THE END

Alok Sharma - Tory shill.

Dear Alok Sharma

Regarding your reply sent 6 September.

"..set out the governments position."

That is truly the most offensive thing you could say to someone who voted for you.

Your job is not to represent the Government to your voters, but to represent your voters to the government. You have failed completely in this.

And what else you have done that is offensive is failed to hold the police, and those in positions of power to account for their illegal actions. Which I will continue to send to you.
What's truly offensive is your failure to support the right of free speech.
What's truly offensive is your failure to support the right to free movement.
What's truly offensive is your failure to support the right to privacy.
What's truly offensive is your failure to represent.
What's truly offensive is that the only thing keeping you and the other MP's in power is the utter and complete disaster that the Her Majesty's official opposition is. The lesser of two evils is not a good thing.

So do not lie when I try to hold you to account by using loaded words like offensive, especially when you are derelict in your duty for which you were elected.

Again with disgust, disdain, and anger.
Your former voter
Ashley Black

An open letter to W3C

Following https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/09/open-letter-w3c-director-ceo-team-and-membership below is my far more terse letter to the W3C for their stance on DRM.


Dear W3C

Fuck you, you fucking cunts.

Regards
Ashley Black