Dear Alok Sharma,
I had wondered why my local shops, including waitrose seems to have many more empty shelves..
https://www.contractorweekly.com/tax-a-ir35-news/ir35-reform-sees-lorry-driver-shortage-reach-crisis-point/
Its because you and all the blues lied about the blairite IR35. Another well done to you.
Yours sincerely,
Ashley Black
Thursday, 15 July 2021
IR35 and empty shop shelves
Thursday, 8 July 2021
Communist in sage
Dear Alok Sharma,
Thank you for your reply about [that communist in SAGE]. I have to say, after watching her refuse to answer the question Richard posed to her, that your reply is best described as a load of utter bull. She is so obviously compromised by her ideology it sickens me that Boris has been taking her advice. This was a free country. Well done of stuffing that up.
Yours in utter disgust as usual.
Ashley Black.
Monday, 5 July 2021
Dear Alok Sharma,
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/583903
You should be helping people who are helping with the housing crisis not persecuting them. Why are you acting like a BLAIR government....
Again in disgust.
Ashley Black
Thursday, 17 June 2021
Dear Alok Sharma and BoJo
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/25/government-scientist-has-advocated-covid-controls-member-communist/
I didn't vote for an expletive Communist. What the expletive bleeping censored is the government doing letting an organisation headed by a commie make decisions about removing my freedoms?!?
Unbelievable and sickening.
Yours sincerely,
Ashley Black
Monday, 26 April 2021
Cancel culture makes it worse.
Been thinking about woke cancel culture and the resulting self censorship.
Back in the good old days, I could put an opinion on the internet and have it agreed with, or disagreed with, and the flaws in it pointed out. Not always pleasant, and sometimes would result in me feeling bad, but I could think about it, see if the points raised had merit, and modify my views or opinion.
But now, since the threats of being doxed, or canceled, I self censor; I don't put many opinions on the internet. The result is that if any of my opinions are wrong, they are not being challenged, and I can continue to silently seethe about my perceived injustices, but I am sure as hell not going to tell them and engage in any kind of actual discussion as it could result in a ban, doxing, or even loss of livelihoods.
So well done wokests, peoples bad or incorrect views are going unchallenged. You have shut down discussion in your fervour to rid the world of people you disagree with, but they are still there, and their views are now even harder to challenge and change.
Tuesday, 24 November 2020
Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill.
I wrote to my MP about the spycops bill, and in his reply, he said:
"It is unlawful for any public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the legislation makes clear that nothing in the Bill detracts from a public authority’s obligations under the Human Rights Act. Therefore, an act that would be incompatible with the ECHR could not lawfully be granted under this Bill."
What a load of shit, because later in his reply he said,
"I am aware of the suggestion that listing specific crimes permitted or prohibited would be a way of offering extra safeguards. I do not believe this would be appropriate. This approach would place in the hands of criminals, terrorists and hostile states a means of identifying agents and sources, creating a potential checklist for suspected CHIS to be tested against. This would place CHIS at personal risk."
Well, the test is easy now innit, Crims, and terrorists just make the "operatives" violate the ECHR, and there we go.
Here is my reply to him:
Dear Alok
"It is unlawful for any public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the legislation makes clear that nothing in the Bill detracts from a public authority’s obligations under the Human Rights Act. Therefore, an act that would be incompatible with the ECHR could not lawfully be granted under this Bill."
But you also said:
"I am aware of the suggestion that listing specific crimes permitted or prohibited would be a way of offering extra safeguards. I do not believe this would be appropriate. This approach would place in the hands of criminals, terrorists and hostile states a means of identifying agents and sources, creating a potential checklist for suspected CHIS to be tested against. This would place CHIS at personal risk."
Well, the test is easy now innit, Crims, and terrorists can just make the "operatives" violate the ECHR, and there we go.